fomo against the other trading apps
How big fomo is next to the terminals, wallets and Telegram bots people use for the same kind of trading, measured on the same 30 days for every app.
fomo ranked #2 of 16 trading apps on DefiLlama by fees in the 30 days to November 8, 2026: $10.3M, behind Axiom ($21.2M) and ahead of GMGN ($8.67M). Without perps fees (fomo's Hyperliquid builder fee and other apps' perps listings), fomo ranked #3 on spot fees alone with $8.60M, behind Axiom and GMGN. Its fees were −63% on the 30 days before.
Fees, last 30 days
October 10, 2026 to November 8, 2026, the same 30 days for every app. Top 10 shown; the full table is below.
- 1. AxiomTrading terminal $21.2M
- 2. fomoSocial trading app $10.3M
- 3. GMGNTrading terminal $8.67M
- 4. PhantomWallet $5.73M
- 5. Terminal (pump.fun)Trading terminal $3.58M
- 6. MetaMaskWallet $3.48M
- 7. pump.fun mobile appLaunchpad app $2.20M
- 8. Trust WalletWallet $2.13M
- 9. Base AppWallet $1.09M
- 10. TrojanTelegram bot $544K
What this does and does not tell you
- It ranks business size, not cost. An app earns more by having more volume or by charging more per trade. For what one trade costs, compare each app's published schedule on the comparison pages.
- fomo keeps almost everything it charges. 97% of its fees counted as revenue. Axiom kept 46%, Terminal (pump.fun) kept 51%, Maestro kept 68%, GMGN kept 75%: apps that pay large referral or cashback programs keep less.
- The whole category cooled. Only Trust Wallet grew on the 30 days before. fomo's own change was −63%.
- fomo's number includes perps. 17% of its fees here are the Hyperliquid builder fee. Leave every app's perps listing out and fomo ranks #3 on spot fees alone ($8.60M), behind Axiom and GMGN. Both rankings are in the table.
Every app
| # | App | Listings | Fees, 30 days | Spot only | Revenue, 30 days | Kept | vs prior 30 days |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | AxiomTrading terminal | Axiom + Axiom Perps | $21.1M#1 | $9.84M | 46% | −45% | |
| 2 | fomoSocial trading app | fomo Wallet + fomo Perps | $8.60M#3 | $10.0M | 97% | −63% | |
| 3 | GMGNTrading terminal | GMGN | $8.67M#2 | $6.49M | 75% | −72% | |
| 4 | PhantomWallet | Phantom Wallet + Phantom Perps | $4.21M#4 | $5.73M | 100% | −29% | |
| 5 | Terminal (pump.fun)Trading terminal | Terminal | $3.58M#5 | $1.83M | 51% | −36% | |
| 6 | MetaMaskWallet | MetaMask Wallet + MetaMask Perps | $1.49M#7 | $3.48M | 100% | −15% | |
| 7 | pump.fun mobile appLaunchpad app | pump.fun Mobile App | $2.20M#6 | $2.20M | 100% | — | |
| 8 | Trust WalletWallet | Trust Wallet Wallet + Trust Wallet Perps | $604K#9 | $2.13M | 100% | +14% | |
| 9 | Base AppWallet | Base App | $1.09M#8 | $1.09M | 100% | −45% | |
| 10 | TrojanTelegram bot | Trojan | $544K#10 | $436K | 80% | −49% | |
| 11 | MaestroTelegram bot | Maestro | $427K#11 | $290K | 68% | −65% | |
| 12 | PhotonTrading terminal | Photon | $219K#12 | $219K | 100% | −40% | |
| 13 | MoonshotTrading app | moonshot.money | $67.0K#13 | $67.0K | 100% | −62% | |
| 14 | BONKbotTelegram bot | BONKbot | $51.6K#14 | $25.8K | 50% | −55% | |
| 15 | Banana GunTelegram bot | Banana Gun | $1.51K#15 | $1.51K | 100% | −67% | |
| 16 | BullXTelegram bot | BullX | $544#16 | $544 | 100% | −31% |
Showing all 16 apps.Full table as CSV
Method
- For each app, DefiLlama's daily fees and revenue series, summed over the same days, ending on fomo's last closed day (2026-11-08). The window ends there so a half-reported day never counts for one app and not another.
- A brand adds the DefiLlama listings filed under it that are trading products: fomo = fomo Wallet + fomo Perps; Axiom = Axiom + Axiom Perps; Phantom = Phantom Wallet + Phantom Perps; MetaMask and Trust Wallet likewise. Staking, stablecoin and prediction listings are left out. Each row's listings are in the table.
- The selection is ours: consumer trading apps, terminals, Telegram bots and wallets that trade the same kind of tokens as fomo. Apps DefiLlama does not list cannot appear.
Caveats
- Each app's fees come from its own DefiLlama adapter, and adapters differ: some read fees on-chain, some use data the app supplies (fomo's EVM fees come from a Dune table fomo publishes).
- fomo's fees leave out Solana referral shares paid inside the trade, so fomo's true fee total is somewhat higher than shown. Other apps may have similar gaps.
- "Revenue" is DefiLlama's retained-fee figure, not profit.
Questions people ask
Is fomo bigger than Axiom?
Not on fees. Over the 30 days to 2026-11-08, Axiom's listings on DefiLlama charged $21.2M in fees and fomo's $10.3M. fomo kept 97% of what it charged as revenue, Axiom 46%.
Is fomo bigger than Phantom?
On fees, yes: $10.3M against Phantom's $5.73M over the same 30 days (DefiLlama, Phantom's wallet swaps and perps). Phantom is a wallet first; its fees here are the swaps and perps placed inside the wallet.
Which trading app makes the most money?
Of the apps compared here, Axiom: $21.2M of fees in the 30 days to 2026-11-08 (DefiLlama). This ranks business size, not which app is cheapest per trade.
Sources
The data behind this page
Free to reuse under CC BY 4.0. All datasets · Methodology
Related
JomoBench is independent and unofficial: not fomo, and not endorsed by FOMO Labs Inc. The fee fomo's app shows before you confirm a trade always wins over any figure here. Not investment advice: most small tokens lose most of their value, and leverage can wipe out a position.